response to HP...
Rachel,
Put me down for the prep session with you and Peggy on 4/26. Assuming we figure out remuneration, and I'm confident we will, I could come to your virtual classroom the morning of Monday, May 2.
Your project and what I've been working on dovetail very tightly. At times, pleading with executive management to think more than a quarter or two ahead is a thankless task, especially if one is trying to focus one to four years out. (Rachel, your approach warms my heart.)
I come at Lifecycle Performance Improvement from two directions.
1. On the nuts-and-bolts side, a colleague and I have just completed an extensive paper on precisely your issues. Take a look at the table of contents at
2. The theoretical aspects merit conversation, not just reading, because the subtleties are vital. One area I'd want to talk with you about is meta-learning. Several of us recently founded the Meta-Learning Lab to explore the value of learning-to-learn and other process improvements to learning. There's an overview at www.meta-learninglab.com. One meta-learning skill with great potential is improving visual learning. My research is way ahead of my documentation on this but my white paper at
Does this feel like the right direction to take with you guys at this point in time?
All the best!

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home